|
|
| Author |
Message |
|
| Guest |
 Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 1:29 pm |
 |
|
|
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 2:28 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hi,
On Feb 14, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Igor Goryachev wrote:
> Hello people!
>
> Is there a finished implementation of XEP-0153 for ejabberd?
the current mod_vcard allows the storage of a PHOTO element. That's
the only thing relevant in that JEP that might need server-side support.
The rest (tagging the presence with the proper xmlns vcard-
temp:x:update) is client side.
best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
Jabber ID: melo@simplicidade.org
Use Jabber!
_______________________________________________
ejabberd mailing list
ejabberd@jabber.ru
http://lists.jabber.ru/mailman/listinfo/ejabberd
Post recived from mailinglist |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:19 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Pedro Melo <melo@simplicidade.org> writes:
> the current mod_vcard allows the storage of a PHOTO element. That's
> the only thing relevant in that JEP that might need server-side
> support.
>
> The rest (tagging the presence with the proper xmlns vcard-
> temp:x:update) is client side.
Actually, the Google Talk server automatically inserts the
vcard-temp:x:update tag in every outgoing presence stanza, so even
clients that don't support it can display avatars. That certainly
fits with the "complexity on the server" mantra.
--
Magnus
JID: legoscia@jabber.cd.chalmers.se
_______________________________________________
ejabberd mailing list
ejabberd@jabber.ru
http://lists.jabber.ru/mailman/listinfo/ejabberd
Post recived from mailinglist |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:44 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Magnus Henoch <mange@freemail.hu> writes:
>> the current mod_vcard allows the storage of a PHOTO element. That's
>> the only thing relevant in that JEP that might need server-side
>> support.
>>
>> The rest (tagging the presence with the proper xmlns vcard-
>> temp:x:update) is client side.
>
> Actually, the Google Talk server automatically inserts the
> vcard-temp:x:update tag in every outgoing presence stanza, so even
> clients that don't support it can display avatars. That certainly
> fits with the "complexity on the server" mantra.
Yes. Certainly I have meant the behaviour of Google Talk server, not
just plain XEP-0153.
--
Igor Goryachev E-Mail/Jabber: igor@goryachev.org
_______________________________________________
ejabberd mailing list
ejabberd@jabber.ru
http://lists.jabber.ru/mailman/listinfo/ejabberd
Post recived from mailinglist |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Guest |
| Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:05 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hi,
On Feb 14, 2007, at 3:19 PM, Magnus Henoch wrote:
> Pedro Melo <melo@simplicidade.org> writes:
>
>> the current mod_vcard allows the storage of a PHOTO element. That's
>> the only thing relevant in that JEP that might need server-side
>> support.
>>
>> The rest (tagging the presence with the proper xmlns vcard-
>> temp:x:update) is client side.
>
> Actually, the Google Talk server automatically inserts the
> vcard-temp:x:update tag in every outgoing presence stanza, so even
> clients that don't support it can display avatars. That certainly
> fits with the "complexity on the server" mantra.
yeah, I know. Remko Tron |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
All times are GMT
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
|
Digg It
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Facebook
Stumble Upon
Technorati
