Erlang Mailing Lists

Author Message

<  Erlang questions mailing list  ~  No more EVA?

casper2000a at omnibis.co
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:42 am Reply with quote
Guest
Hi All,

I wonder why did Eva get withdrawn from the latest Erlang/OTP release? Is it because any
commercial/license issue, since it's outdates or replaced by any other package?

Thanks!
Eranga

--------------This mail sent through OmniBIS.com--------------



Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://m2f.sourceforge.net)
kenneth at erix.ericsson.
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 5:59 pm Reply with quote
Guest
Hi,

The Eva application was withdrawn from the R10B release because:
- we knew that no commercial user (i.e paying) was using it.
- we did not know any open source user using it (but we have heard of some
after the decision)
- Eva needs to be updated due to dependencies to snmp which has got small changes
in the API's and we did not think it was worth the effort since nobody is using it.
- There are other event and alarm solutions that could be included in OTP some day if
the interest is big enough.
- If someone really need Eva it should be easy to take Eva from R9B ,
do some minor corrections
and run it together with the rest of R10B.

/Regards Kenneth Lundin (Product Manager for Erlang/OTP)





















Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://m2f.sourceforge.net)
casper2000a at omnibis.co
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:30 am Reply with quote
Guest
Hi Kenneth,

Thanks for your advice.

I would like to see a good event and alarm solution in OTP, since I think
it's a most important part in a system. It'll be really helpful, if you can
advice me what're the other event and alarm solutions you hinted below, so I
can see to integrate them and can give back to the community, if it'll be
any use.

Cheers,
Eranga






-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Lundin [mailto:kenneth_at_erix.ericsson.se]
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 11:59 PM
To: Erlang-Questions_at_Erlang. Org; casper2000a_at_om.omnibis.com; Casper
Subject: Re: No more EVA?

Hi,

The Eva application was withdrawn from the R10B release because:
- we knew that no commercial user (i.e paying) was using it.
- we did not know any open source user using it (but we have heard of some
after the decision)
- Eva needs to be updated due to dependencies to snmp which has got small
changes
in the API's and we did not think it was worth the effort since nobody is
using it.
- There are other event and alarm solutions that could be included in OTP
some day if
the interest is big enough.
- If someone really need Eva it should be easy to take Eva from R9B ,
do some minor corrections
and run it together with the rest of R10B.

/Regards Kenneth Lundin (Product Manager for Erlang/OTP)






















Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://m2f.sourceforge.net)
kenneth at erix.ericsson.
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:32 am Reply with quote
Guest
Hi,

The other event and alarm solution is part of a product we have
(written in Erlang) and is not that easy to extract as a separate generic
application. I meant that we (Erlang/OTP developers at Ericsson) could extract that
solution and include it in OTP when and if interest is big enough.
We do not have that in our current plans for what to do during 2005.

/Regards Kenneth

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Casper [mailto:casper2000a_at_omnibis.com]
> Sent: den 10 januari 2005 05:39
> To: 'Kenneth Lundin'
> Cc: 'Erlang-Questions_at_Erlang. Org'
> Subject: RE: No more EVA?
>
>
> Hi Kenneth,
>
> Thanks for your advice.
>
> I would like to see a good event and alarm solution in OTP, since I think
> it's a most important part in a system. It'll be really helpful, if you can
> advice me what're the other event and alarm solutions you hinted below, so I
> can see to integrate them and can give back to the community, if it'll be
> any use.
>
> Cheers,
> Eranga
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kenneth Lundin [mailto:kenneth_at_erix.ericsson.se]
> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 11:59 PM
> To: Erlang-Questions_at_Erlang. Org; casper2000a_at_om.omnibis.com; Casper
> Subject: Re: No more EVA?
>
> Hi,
>
> The Eva application was withdrawn from the R10B release because:
> - we knew that no commercial user (i.e paying) was using it.
> - we did not know any open source user using it (but we have heard of some
> after the decision)
> - Eva needs to be updated due to dependencies to snmp which has got small
> changes
> in the API's and we did not think it was worth the effort since nobody is
> using it.
> - There are other event and alarm solutions that could be included in OTP
> some day if
> the interest is big enough.
> - If someone really need Eva it should be easy to take Eva from R9B ,
> do some minor corrections
> and run it together with the rest of R10B.
>
> /Regards Kenneth Lundin (Product Manager for Erlang/OTP)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://m2f.sourceforge.net)
casper2000a at omnibis.co
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:54 am Reply with quote
Guest
Kenneth,

Thanks for the advice.

Erlang Community: Am I the only one with an interest/need of an Event and
Alarm application in Erlang/OTP?

Cheers,
Eranga



-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Lundin [mailto:kenneth_at_erix.ericsson.se]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 12:32 PM
To: Casper
Cc: 'Erlang-Questions_at_Erlang. Org'
Subject: RE: No more EVA?

Hi,

The other event and alarm solution is part of a product we have
(written in Erlang) and is not that easy to extract as a separate generic
application. I meant that we (Erlang/OTP developers at Ericsson) could
extract that
solution and include it in OTP when and if interest is big enough.
We do not have that in our current plans for what to do during 2005.

/Regards Kenneth

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Casper [mailto:casper2000a_at_omnibis.com]
> Sent: den 10 januari 2005 05:39
> To: 'Kenneth Lundin'
> Cc: 'Erlang-Questions_at_Erlang. Org'
> Subject: RE: No more EVA?
>
>
> Hi Kenneth,
>
> Thanks for your advice.
>
> I would like to see a good event and alarm solution in OTP, since I think
> it's a most important part in a system. It'll be really helpful, if you
can
> advice me what're the other event and alarm solutions you hinted below, so
I
> can see to integrate them and can give back to the community, if it'll be
> any use.
>
> Cheers,
> Eranga
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kenneth Lundin [mailto:kenneth_at_erix.ericsson.se]
> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 11:59 PM
> To: Erlang-Questions_at_Erlang. Org; casper2000a_at_om.omnibis.com; Casper
> Subject: Re: No more EVA?
>
> Hi,
>
> The Eva application was withdrawn from the R10B release because:
> - we knew that no commercial user (i.e paying) was using it.
> - we did not know any open source user using it (but we have heard of some
> after the decision)
> - Eva needs to be updated due to dependencies to snmp which has got small
> changes
> in the API's and we did not think it was worth the effort since nobody
is
> using it.
> - There are other event and alarm solutions that could be included in OTP
> some day if
> the interest is big enough.
> - If someone really need Eva it should be easy to take Eva from R9B ,
> do some minor corrections
> and run it together with the rest of R10B.
>
> /Regards Kenneth Lundin (Product Manager for Erlang/OTP)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>



Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://m2f.sourceforge.net)
matthias at corelatus.se
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:01 am Reply with quote
Guest
Casper writes:

> Erlang Community: Am I the only one with an interest/need of an Event and
> Alarm application in Erlang/OTP?

I looked at EVA a few years ago when writing the event and alarm code
for an embedded system. That system didn't need SNMP and didn't have
mnesia, so that left me looking at 11000 lines of code which don't do
a whole lot more than remember which alarms are on and and tell other
processes about it. Seemed about as much help as having someone else
handle the fork while I'm eating ravioli, and a lot less fun.

It seems that others have arrived at the same conclusion: in 99.9% of
applications, EVA is more trouble than it's worth. I suspect that
holds for all canned alarm solutions.

But just because EVA was removed from the distribution doesn't mean
you can't use it. It's still available for download.

Matthias


Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://m2f.sourceforge.net)
nick at erix.ericsson.se
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 9:07 am Reply with quote
Guest
Hi!

No, you're not the only one. See for example http://www.3gpp.org/.

The application cosTime supports similar functionality as Eva. You should
also look into cosNotification (alt. cosEvent), which is used by 3GPP to
handle Events/Alarms.

/Nick

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Casper wrote:

> Kenneth,
>
> Thanks for the advice.
>
> Erlang Community: Am I the only one with an interest/need of an Event and
> Alarm application in Erlang/OTP?
>
> Cheers,
> Eranga
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kenneth Lundin [mailto:kenneth_at_erix.ericsson.se]
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 12:32 PM
> To: Casper
> Cc: 'Erlang-Questions_at_Erlang. Org'
> Subject: RE: No more EVA?
>
> Hi,
>
> The other event and alarm solution is part of a product we have
> (written in Erlang) and is not that easy to extract as a separate generic
> application. I meant that we (Erlang/OTP developers at Ericsson) could
> extract that
> solution and include it in OTP when and if interest is big enough.
> We do not have that in our current plans for what to do during 2005.
>
> /Regards Kenneth
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Casper [mailto:casper2000a_at_omnibis.com]
> > Sent: den 10 januari 2005 05:39
> > To: 'Kenneth Lundin'
> > Cc: 'Erlang-Questions_at_Erlang. Org'
> > Subject: RE: No more EVA?
> >
> >
> > Hi Kenneth,
> >
> > Thanks for your advice.
> >
> > I would like to see a good event and alarm solution in OTP, since I think
> > it's a most important part in a system. It'll be really helpful, if you
> can
> > advice me what're the other event and alarm solutions you hinted below, so
> I
> > can see to integrate them and can give back to the community, if it'll be
> > any use.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Eranga
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kenneth Lundin [mailto:kenneth_at_erix.ericsson.se]
> > Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 11:59 PM
> > To: Erlang-Questions_at_Erlang. Org; casper2000a_at_om.omnibis.com; Casper
> > Subject: Re: No more EVA?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Eva application was withdrawn from the R10B release because:
> > - we knew that no commercial user (i.e paying) was using it.
> > - we did not know any open source user using it (but we have heard of some
> > after the decision)
> > - Eva needs to be updated due to dependencies to snmp which has got small
> > changes
> > in the API's and we did not think it was worth the effort since nobody
> is
> > using it.
> > - There are other event and alarm solutions that could be included in OTP
> > some day if
> > the interest is big enough.
> > - If someone really need Eva it should be easy to take Eva from R9B ,
> > do some minor corrections
> > and run it together with the rest of R10B.
> >
> > /Regards Kenneth Lundin (Product Manager for Erlang/OTP)



Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://m2f.sourceforge.net)
tobbe at nortelnetworks.c
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 9:34 am Reply with quote
Guest
Casper wrote:

>Kenneth,
>
>Thanks for the advice.
>
>Erlang Community: Am I the only one with an interest/need of an Event and
>Alarm application in Erlang/OTP?
>
>
>
We, at Nortel, are using EVA !!

Cheers, Tobbe

>Cheers,
>Eranga
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kenneth Lundin [mailto:kenneth_at_erix.ericsson.se]
>Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 12:32 PM
>To: Casper
>Cc: 'Erlang-Questions_at_Erlang. Org'
>Subject: RE: No more EVA?
>
>Hi,
>
>The other event and alarm solution is part of a product we have
>(written in Erlang) and is not that easy to extract as a separate generic
>application. I meant that we (Erlang/OTP developers at Ericsson) could
>extract that
>solution and include it in OTP when and if interest is big enough.
>We do not have that in our current plans for what to do during 2005.
>
>/Regards Kenneth
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Casper [mailto:casper2000a_at_omnibis.com]
>>Sent: den 10 januari 2005 05:39
>>To: 'Kenneth Lundin'
>>Cc: 'Erlang-Questions_at_Erlang. Org'
>>Subject: RE: No more EVA?
>>
>>
>>Hi Kenneth,
>>
>>Thanks for your advice.
>>
>>I would like to see a good event and alarm solution in OTP, since I think
>>it's a most important part in a system. It'll be really helpful, if you
>>
>>
>can
>
>
>>advice me what're the other event and alarm solutions you hinted below, so
>>
>>
>I
>
>
>>can see to integrate them and can give back to the community, if it'll be
>>any use.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Eranga
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Kenneth Lundin [mailto:kenneth_at_erix.ericsson.se]
>>Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 11:59 PM
>>To: Erlang-Questions_at_Erlang. Org; casper2000a_at_om.omnibis.com; Casper
>>Subject: Re: No more EVA?
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>The Eva application was withdrawn from the R10B release because:
>>- we knew that no commercial user (i.e paying) was using it.
>>- we did not know any open source user using it (but we have heard of some
>>after the decision)
>>- Eva needs to be updated due to dependencies to snmp which has got small
>>changes
>> in the API's and we did not think it was worth the effort since nobody
>>
>>
>is
>
>
>>using it.
>>- There are other event and alarm solutions that could be included in OTP
>>some day if
>> the interest is big enough.
>>- If someone really need Eva it should be easy to take Eva from R9B ,
>>do some minor corrections
>>and run it together with the rest of R10B.
>>
>>/Regards Kenneth Lundin (Product Manager for Erlang/OTP)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>



Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://m2f.sourceforge.net)
casper2000a at omnibis.co
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 10:15 am Reply with quote
Guest
Hi Matthias,

With the little reading I did on EVA, it seems to me more than an event
handler. It contains SNMP adaptation support and log management. First I
thought it's pretty helpful though withdrawal gave me second thoughts.

Eranga





-----Original Message-----
From: Matthias Lang [mailto:matthias_at_corelatus.se]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 1:56 PM
To: Casper
Cc: erlang-questions_at_erlang.org
Subject: RE: No more EVA?

Casper writes:

> Erlang Community: Am I the only one with an interest/need of an Event and
> Alarm application in Erlang/OTP?

I looked at EVA a few years ago when writing the event and alarm code
for an embedded system. That system didn't need SNMP and didn't have
mnesia, so that left me looking at 11000 lines of code which don't do
a whole lot more than remember which alarms are on and and tell other
processes about it. Seemed about as much help as having someone else
handle the fork while I'm eating ravioli, and a lot less fun.

It seems that others have arrived at the same conclusion: in 99.9% of
applications, EVA is more trouble than it's worth. I suspect that
holds for all canned alarm solutions.

But just because EVA was removed from the distribution doesn't mean
you can't use it. It's still available for download.

Matthias



Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://m2f.sourceforge.net)
erlang-list at dominicwil
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:00 pm Reply with quote
Guest
Casper wrote:

> Erlang Community: Am I the only one with an interest/need of an Event and
> Alarm application in Erlang/OTP?

A year ago, when I was trying to convince my
then-company to use Erlang, an event-alarm app was part
of the goodies I listed. It's consistent with the sort
of systems Erlang is very suitable for.

I'm not convinced I would have ended up actually using
it, as against rolling our own.

And these days, I have no use for it: I'm more
interested in the pure Erlang language than in OTP and
the apps.

Regards,

Dominic Williams
http://www.dominicwilliams.net

----


Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://m2f.sourceforge.net)
serge
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:21 am Reply with quote
Guest
If there are plans to withdraw EVA from distribution, does it mean that OS_MON will be excluded as well? There is a dependency of OS_MON on EVA in the OTP-OS-MON-MIB.mib:

IMPORTS
currentAlarmObject, currentAlarmSeverity, currentAlarmTime
FROM OTP-EVA-MIB

What are the OTP team's future plans for dealing with this? I suppose it would be best to eliminate this dependency by either creating another MIB with these alarm objects defined, or incorporate them in the OS_MON or SASL.

Regards,

Serge

kenneth at erix.ericsson. wrote:

Hi,

The Eva application was withdrawn from the R10B release because:
- we knew that no commercial user (i.e paying) was using it.
- we did not know any open source user using it (but we have heard of some
after the decision)
- Eva needs to be updated due to dependencies to snmp which has got small changes
in the API's and we did not think it was worth the effort since nobody is using it.
- There are other event and alarm solutions that could be included in OTP some day if
the interest is big enough.
- If someone really need Eva it should be easy to take Eva from R9B ,
do some minor corrections
and run it together with the rest of R10B.

/Regards Kenneth Lundin (Product Manager for Erlang/OTP)





















Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://m2f.sourceforge.net)
wuji
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:58 am Reply with quote
User Joined: 10 Aug 2012 Posts: 654
of one percent of those stops did the motorist choose choose [h2]cheap polo ralph lauren[/h2] choose to flee."Attorney Stephanie Yablow lobbied hard for reforms after
elderly mother and father were injured in a high speed speed jordan 6 olympic speed chase. She was shocked to learn how little recourse
had."You've got to ask, is it worth it?" she said.It's said.It's cheap Ralph Lauren said.It's a judgment police officers have to make on the
Jurors Convict Accused Ringleader17-Year-Old Found Guilty of Aggravated Battery in in jordan 6 olympic 2012 in Teen-Burning TrialBy ALON HARISHJune 19. 2012— Jurors in Fort
Fla., Tuesday evening convicted 17-year-old Matthew Bent of aggravated battery battery [h4]cheap Ralph Lauren[/h4] battery for his role in the 2009 torching of Michael
his middle-school classmate.Prosecutors failed to secure a conviction on Bent's Bent's [h3]cheap designer *beep*[/h3] Bent's second-degree attempted murder charge. Bent would have faced up
View user's profile Send private message

Display posts from previous:  

All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum