Erlang Mailing Lists

Author Message

<  RabbitMQ mailing list  ~  ocaml libs

Guest
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:28 am Reply with quote
Guest
I haven't been able to find anything. Anyone know of a good OCaml AMQP
client library?

Thanks.

-Joe

--
Name: Joseph A. Williams
Email: joe@joetify.com
Blog: http://www.joeandmotorboat.com/


_______________________________________________
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com
http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
Post received from mailinglist
Guest
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:23 am Reply with quote
Guest
Joe,

On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Joe Williams <joe@joetify.com> wrote:
> I haven't been able to find anything. Anyone know of a good OCaml AMQP
> client library?

Ha Smile

Well, the closest I have seen to this on the web is the following
debate on the utility and clarity of STOMP, variously implemented by
RabbitMQ, ActiveMQ and others.
http://eigenclass.org/R2/writings/rabbitmq-STOMP-semantics

Of course that does not really answer your question.

We do know of at least one customer in production with RabbitMQ from
F#. Would an introduction be helpful?

alexis



>
> Thanks.
>
> -Joe
>
> --
> Name: Joseph A. Williams
> Email: joe@joetify.com
> Blog: http://www.joeandmotorboat.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
> rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com
> http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>

_______________________________________________
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com
http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
Post received from mailinglist
tonyg
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:00 pm Reply with quote
User Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 199
Hi Joe,

I was looking into this over the xmas break. It ought to be possible to
get something working fairly quickly, but whether it'll work well or
efficiently I don't know. The biggest missing piece was integration
between sockets and the Event module. Alternatives like Lwt 2.0 were a
bit disappointing. I suppose plain old threading could work well enough;
I don't know enough of OCaml style and idiom to know what is the right
approach here.

I looked into SML/NJ, as well. What a lovely system! The lightweight
continuations make for good integration between sockets and CML. So, if
it were my spare time, I'd likely build an SML/NJ library rather than an
OCaml one Smile

Regards,
Tony


Joe Williams wrote:
> I haven't been able to find anything. Anyone know of a good OCaml AMQP
> client library?
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Joe
>

_______________________________________________
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com
http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
Post received from mailinglist
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Guest
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:45 pm Reply with quote
Guest
Thanks Alexis, an intro might be good to get an idea where to start.

-Joe


On 12/28/09 2:22 AM, Alexis Richardson wrote:
> Joe,
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Joe Williams<joe@joetify.com> wrote:
>
>> I haven't been able to find anything. Anyone know of a good OCaml AMQP
>> client library?
>>
> Ha Smile
>
> Well, the closest I have seen to this on the web is the following
> debate on the utility and clarity of STOMP, variously implemented by
> RabbitMQ, ActiveMQ and others.
> http://eigenclass.org/R2/writings/rabbitmq-STOMP-semantics
>
> Of course that does not really answer your question.
>
> We do know of at least one customer in production with RabbitMQ from
> F#. Would an introduction be helpful?
>
> alexis
>
>
>
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -Joe
>>
>> --
>> Name: Joseph A. Williams
>> Email: joe@joetify.com
>> Blog: http://www.joeandmotorboat.com/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
>> rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com
>> http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
>>
>>

--
Name: Joseph A. Williams
Email: joe@joetify.com
Blog: http://www.joeandmotorboat.com/


_______________________________________________
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com
http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
Post received from mailinglist
Guest
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:48 pm Reply with quote
Guest
Thanks Tony, I'll take a look at SML/NJ.

-Joe


On 12/28/09 3:59 AM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> I was looking into this over the xmas break. It ought to be possible to
> get something working fairly quickly, but whether it'll work well or
> efficiently I don't know. The biggest missing piece was integration
> between sockets and the Event module. Alternatives like Lwt 2.0 were a
> bit disappointing. I suppose plain old threading could work well enough;
> I don't know enough of OCaml style and idiom to know what is the right
> approach here.
>
> I looked into SML/NJ, as well. What a lovely system! The lightweight
> continuations make for good integration between sockets and CML. So, if
> it were my spare time, I'd likely build an SML/NJ library rather than an
> OCaml one Smile
>
> Regards,
> Tony
>
>
> Joe Williams wrote:
>
>> I haven't been able to find anything. Anyone know of a good OCaml AMQP
>> client library?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -Joe
>>
>>

--
Name: Joseph A. Williams
Email: joe@joetify.com
Blog: http://www.joeandmotorboat.com/


_______________________________________________
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com
http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
Post received from mailinglist
Guest
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:18 pm Reply with quote
Guest
Tony,

Looking at Lwt it seems that for an OCaml AMQP lib it might be the
(only?) way to go. I bet you're right though regarding the inadequacies
of Lwt and missing piece between sockets and events otherwise there
would probably already be an AMQP lib. Smile

-Joe


On 12/28/09 10:47 AM, Joe Williams wrote:
> Thanks Tony, I'll take a look at SML/NJ.
>
> -Joe
>
>
> On 12/28/09 3:59 AM, Tony Garnock-Jones wrote:
>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> I was looking into this over the xmas break. It ought to be possible to
>> get something working fairly quickly, but whether it'll work well or
>> efficiently I don't know. The biggest missing piece was integration
>> between sockets and the Event module. Alternatives like Lwt 2.0 were a
>> bit disappointing. I suppose plain old threading could work well enough;
>> I don't know enough of OCaml style and idiom to know what is the right
>> approach here.
>>
>> I looked into SML/NJ, as well. What a lovely system! The lightweight
>> continuations make for good integration between sockets and CML. So, if
>> it were my spare time, I'd likely build an SML/NJ library rather than an
>> OCaml one Smile
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tony
>>
>>
>> Joe Williams wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I haven't been able to find anything. Anyone know of a good OCaml AMQP
>>> client library?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> -Joe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

--
Name: Joseph A. Williams
Email: joe@joetify.com
Blog: http://www.joeandmotorboat.com/


_______________________________________________
rabbitmq-discuss mailing list
rabbitmq-discuss@lists.rabbitmq.com
http://lists.rabbitmq.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbitmq-discuss
Post received from mailinglist

Display posts from previous:  

All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum