|
|
| Author |
Message |
|
| vlad_dumitrescu at hotmai |
 Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2003 8:37 pm |
 |
|
|
Guest
|
Hello,
I have looked inside gen_server, and discovered some very minor things that
could be done better: calls to apply/3 that can be replaced with
Mod:Fun(Args) and also replacing references to gen_server with ?MODULE (so
that related new behaviours can be more easily generated).
I also have implemented the "layered gen_server" I mentioned on
erlang-questions, both backwards compatible (using process dictionary) and
as a new behaviour, but I am not sure if it's right to send them to you
here, before in some way finding out if this is a useful improvement.
best regards,
Vlad
Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://m2f.sourceforge.net) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| raimo.niskanen at uab.eri |
| Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 12:51 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Your patch has been accepted for the next R9 release.
/ Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP
Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have looked inside gen_server, and discovered some very minor things that
> could be done better: calls to apply/3 that can be replaced with
> Mod:Fun(Args) and also replacing references to gen_server with ?MODULE (so
> that related new behaviours can be more easily generated).
>
> I also have implemented the "layered gen_server" I mentioned on
> erlang-questions, both backwards compatible (using process dictionary) and
> as a new behaviour, but I am not sure if it's right to send them to you
> here, before in some way finding out if this is a useful improvement.
>
> best regards,
> Vlad
Post generated using Mail2Forum (http://m2f.sourceforge.net) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
All times are GMT
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|
Digg It
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Facebook
Stumble Upon
Technorati
