|
|
| Author |
Message |
|
| 0x6e6562 |
 Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:49 am |
 |
|
|
User
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 250
|
Begin forwarded message:Quote:
Matthias,
On 16 Apr 2008, at 07:50, Matthias Radestock wrote:
Quote: Michael, and anybody else who can spare a couple of minutes,
Quote: The CPU consumption of the Erlang process reported in step 9 should be near 0% at the end of both tests. However, on some systems the second test leaves the Erlang process consuming 100% CPU, though the Erlang shell remains responsive. I am interested in finding out which systems exhibit this behaviour and which don't.
Quote: When reporting your results please include information about your system (if you are on Unix just run 'uname -a') and Erlang version (the version number displayed when starting the Erlang shell will do just fine).
I can reproduce this as well using R12B-0.
gr8:sock_spin 0x6e6562$ uname -a
Darwin host46.msm.che.vodafone 9.2.2 Darwin Kernel Version 9.2.2: Tue Mar |
|
|
| Back to top |
 
|
|
|
All times are GMT
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|
Digg It
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Facebook
Stumble Upon
Technorati
