|
|
| Author |
Message |
< Erlang ~ your choice of persistent storage, to compliment mnesia ? |
what persistent storage do you use to compliment mnesia (for the more transcient usage)?
| more mnesia ! |
| [ 2 ] 50% |
| |
| flat files / xml |
| [ 0 ] 0% |
| |
| mysql |
| [ 0 ] 0% |
| |
| postgres |
| [ 1 ] 25% |
| |
| other dbms |
| [ 0 ] 0% |
| |
| amazon s3 ,ec2 / cloud computing |
| [ 0 ] 0% |
| |
| none of the above (other) |
| [ 0 ] 0% |
| |
| depends whether its distributed or single node |
| [ 1 ] 25% |
| |
Total Votes : 4 |
|
| bosky101 |
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:38 pm |
|
|
|
Joined: 30 Oct 2007
Posts: 3
Location: india
|
(a) mnesia itself!
(b) flat files / xml
(c) mysql
(d) postgres
(e) other dbms
(f) amazon s3 ,ec2 / other cloud computing service
(g) none of the above (pls mention) ?
(h) depends on whether it is distributed or single node
im planning to use mnesia as a more transcient storage, updated with data from a more persistent storage like mysql.
What are you persistent storage strategies to compliment mnesia? I'd also like you to take two seperate scenario's : (i) running on single node (ii)running on multiple nodes
Keep Clicking,
Bhasker |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
All times are GMT
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
|